Of these three models, the Reebok Nano X1 takes the edge for HIIT, agility, and plyometric work. Generally, when a shoe is more stable, then we’ll start to see versatility and responsiveness go down a bit. For many, this shoe could technically work for their training and lifting, but the upper of this model also doesn’t provide the same level of durability for CrossFit workouts as the Reebok Nano X and some of the Nano X1 iterations.īased on the lifting performance of each shoe, you could probably already guess which models excel for more versatile style training. The Nanoflex TR has a 4mm heel-to-toe drop and a foam midsole that does an okay job under heavier loads up until 455 lbs. This model is marketed as a budget-friendly Reebok Nano and it’s pretty clear to see that its construction doesn’t hold up to the same intensity of tasks as the Nano X and Nano X1. The Reebok Nanoflex TR is the lowest tier model between the three when it comes to supporting heavier lifting. The upper in the traditional Reebok Nano X1 is also not the most durable for abrasion resistance in CrossFit workouts and I’d suggest looking into the Nano X1 Adventure or Grit for increased durability. This model has a Floatride Energy Foam midsole that has a decent level of responsiveness while also being fairly adequate for limiting a ton of compression.įor stability testing, I’ve lifted over 500 lbs in this model, too, and it worked well, but there is definitely a lower threshold for compression compared to the Reebok Nano X. The Reebok Nano X1 comes with a 7mm heel-to-toe drop and works decently well for moderate loading and casual CrossFit workouts. Of these three, the Reebok Nano X is by far the most superior model for CrossFit especially when you consider its durability. Additionally, this model also features a durable upper and construction and mid-foot support for tackling exercises that you’ll commonly see in CrossFit workouts like rope climbs and burpees.
In the Reebok Nano X, I’ve trap bar deadlifted 525 lbs for reps to test its stability and didn’t notice any major issues with compression. This model features a 4mm heel-to-toe drop and a high-density midsole construction that can accommodate loads of over 500 lbs. The Reebok Nano X is by far the best model of these three for lifting heavy and tackling CrossFit workouts. When it comes to stability and CrossFit performance, all three of these shoes are very different. To break down each shoe’s performance, I’m going to compare each model in the context of lifting and CrossFit, versatile training, and running, then select a winner and discuss my thoughts as to why. This round-up discussed the best models for CrossFit, lifting, men, women, and much more! Reebok Nanoflex TR Vs Nano X1 Vs Nano X Performance On the market for new cross-training shoes? Make sure you check out my 7 best cross-training shoes round-up.
Reebok Nanoflex TR Vs Nano X1 Vs Nano X Durability.Reebok Nanoflex TR Vs Nano X1 Vs Nano X Construction.Reebok Nanoflex TR Vs Nano X1 Vs Nano X Performance.
0 kommentar(er)
